My post “What Is an Avatar Master?” drew some good criticism last night from a local friend of mine, David. The following post is largely in reply to his comments.
David: Thank you for taking time to weigh in on this subject. I think you make some very good points.
Regarding Wilber, you are more than welcome to raise the question of whether he’s leading a cult. In fact, I’ve done so myself, in my posting “Is Ken Wilber’s Integral Institute a Cult?”
I believe it’s important for any enthusiast of any school of thinking to explore the shadow side of what they value so much.
Let me try to boil down my own perspective on Avatar to something that seems really fundamental, at least to me.
One of my concerns about Avatar — based on my limited exposure, including the comments in response to my post (many of which I have since deleted for their lack of constructiveness) — is that I’m seeing a lot of identification for and against, but I’m seeing very little of people exploring the shadow side of their own commitments.
(Incidentally, I’m not using the word “shadow” in any technical sense; I am simply alluding to the fact that anything that casts intense light will inevitably cast shadow as well, if only because of our individual limitations in dealing with strong influences in our life.)
Now, even with my limited knowledge of Avatar, I see some very strong shadow elements.
The Avatar program teaches “secret” spiritual trainings, is very expensive, provides a financial incentive for graduates to recruit new students, and goes to some length to keep its teachings under wraps except for people who are recruited in the prescribed fashion.
Those factors alone are not enough to establish that an organization is a cult.
They would, however, virtually guarantee that an organization is prone to many of the cultish behaviors that seem endemic to human nature.
For example, it makes it likely that some people will come to identify with the secret Avatar program, and promote it to the exclusion of many other (free or less expensive) approaches for fostering spiritual growth that may be equally effective — if you are genuinely concerned with people’s growth rather than your institutional commitments.
It makes it likely that doe-eyed graduates will recruit other potential students with stories of having found the One Path.
It makes it likely that some people will become very zealous about the program but later come to regret their financial investment, social involvement, or efforts to recruit other people into the program.
So much of this just doesn’t seem truly spiritual in any way that I can recognize. There are no doubt some very healthy aspects to the Avatar training. But the financial side doesn’t seem to me to be one of them.
Again, right now I’m not trying to establish that Avatar is a cult. I’m simply saying that the organization is set up in a way that, other things being equal, would bring out many of the cult-like behaviors to which many people are prone.
And so the question that comes to my mind is, What safeguards have been built into the Avatar program to prevent these kinds of excesses from being realized?
I have no doubt that there are many, many Avatar teachers — including you, David — who discourage and frown upon cultish behavior.
However, the organizational structure is working against you. Merely adding young enthusiastic idealism to the above mixture is guaranteed to result in some cultish attitudes.
I’m personally doubtful that any amount of good intention, or common sense among the advanced teachers, will be able to fully mitigate the factors I discuss above. But perhaps I’m wrong.
In any case, I would be very interested to see proponents of Avatar publicly acknowledging both the pros and cons of their organization — not just the ways in which it can facilitate awakening, but also the ways in which it can result in problems.
To my mind, that would be the a good sign that some of Avatar’s proponents have succeeded in defying the organizational strictures that could encourage cultish behavior.
In my experience, one of the surest signs of a cult influence at work is the inability or unwillingness to discuss the negative aspects of an organization, because it suggests an unhealthy level of identification with that organization.