<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Meditation Change Your Philosophy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.muditajournal.com/archives/183.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.muditajournal.com/archives/183.php</link>
	<description>Mindfulness and Individualism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikki</title>
		<link>http://www.muditajournal.com/archives/183.php#comment-64472</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 22:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zader.com/2006/?p=183#comment-64472</guid>
		<description>So what about the inverse of this? If one has an innate, &quot;natural&quot; understanding &amp; belief in the basic philosophy taught by the Buddha and his successors, does one still need to go through all the motions (i.e. meditation) that is supposed to result in the &quot;discovery&quot; of these truths?  What is the point if one already knows them and has no need of discovering them? Since the Buddha went to all that trouble to reach the conclusions he reached, and then to teach them and pass them down to us, what purpose does it serve for us to sit in meditation to reach the same conclusions - especially if such an understanding of reality is already an innate part of one&#039;s psyche?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what about the inverse of this? If one has an innate, &#8220;natural&#8221; understanding &amp; belief in the basic philosophy taught by the Buddha and his successors, does one still need to go through all the motions (i.e. meditation) that is supposed to result in the &#8220;discovery&#8221; of these truths?  What is the point if one already knows them and has no need of discovering them? Since the Buddha went to all that trouble to reach the conclusions he reached, and then to teach them and pass them down to us, what purpose does it serve for us to sit in meditation to reach the same conclusions &#8211; especially if such an understanding of reality is already an innate part of one&#8217;s psyche?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.muditajournal.com/archives/183.php#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2004 23:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zader.com/2006/?p=183#comment-198</guid>
		<description>&quot;mindful of the suffering of animals&quot;

What about plants, which are sentient ?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;mindful of the suffering of animals&#8221;</p>
<p>What about plants, which are sentient ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: www.muditajournal.com @ 2012-02-11 19:28:35 -->
